Ministry Growth Diagnosticpresented by Life Is Rich Global

This environment uses fictional records only and is kept entirely separate from live ministry dashboards. Go to your real dashboard.

Demonstration data — fictional ministry, no real people

Ministry Growth Diagnostic report

Greater Fictional Hope Fellowship (demo)

Cycle:
October ministry baseline
Dates:
2026-10-01 to 2026-10-31
Report date:
10/28/2026
Assessment version:
v1.0 · scoring score-v1.0

Who responded and evidence limits

  • 2 leadership self-assessment(s): Pastor, Choir Director. Leadership roles can be identifiable; these are self-reports, not verification.
  • 23 participant response(s). Sunday worship: 14 · Bible study: too few to display · Concert: too few to display
  • Results with fewer than 5 valid responses are hidden, including cells that would reveal them by subtraction. We do not claim anonymity when role, comments, or contact details are collected.

Leadership practice profile

A. Welcome and continued connection73 / 100 · Developing practice

2 contributing leader(s) · 5/6 numeric items · range 63–83

B. Faith and daily application58 / 100 · Developing practice

2 contributing leader(s) · 6/6 numeric items · range 58–58

C. Participant goals and useful resources19 / 100 · Not yet established

2 contributing leader(s) · 5/6 numeric items · range 13–25

D. Consistency and accountability25 / 100 · Inconsistent practice

2 contributing leader(s) · 6/6 numeric items · range 25–25

E. Leadership and shared responsibility50 / 100 · Developing practice

2 contributing leader(s) · 6/6 numeric items · range 42–58

F. Progress and learning15 / 100 · Not yet established

2 contributing leader(s) · 5/6 numeric items · range 13–17

Bands are provisional coaching categories, not a validated measure. There is no overall score, grade, or ranking.

Participant experience results

Ratings, spiritual meaningfulness, operating practices, needs, and interest are reported separately and never combined into one score.

Sunday worship

R1 Welcomed and includedvalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 0
1
0
2
0
3
2
4
6
5
6
R2 Clarity of message/teachingvalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 0
1
0
2
0
3
3
4
7
5
4
R3 Music or worshipvalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
4
5
10
R4 Organization, pace, lengthvalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 0
1
0
2
3
3
7
4
4
5
0
R5 Sound and hearingvalid 11 · N/A <5 · missing 0
1
0
2
0
3
4
4
7
5
0
R6 Access to space/materials/onlinevalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 0
1
0
2
0
3
0
4
9
5
5
R7 Spiritual meaningfulness (separate)valid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 0
Not at all
0
Slightly
0
Moderately
4
Very
5
Extremely
5
R10 Knew how to take a next stepvalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 0
Yes
3
Partly
3
No
5
Did not want a next step
3
Not sure
0
R11 Knew whom to contact for supportvalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 0
Yes
5
No
5
Did not seek support
4
Not sure
0

Bible study

Too few responses to display

Concert

Too few responses to display

Expressed needs, interest, barriers, and formats

N1 Support areas (multiple selections; counts exceed respondents)valid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 9
Spiritual
4
Mental/learning and mindset
0
Emotional
0
Relational/family
4
Physical
0
Financial/household stewardship
7
Employment/business skills
3
Other
0
None now
3
Not sure
0
N3 Interest in optional 90-day groupvalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 9
Not interested
3
Slightly
0
Moderately
3
Very
3
Extremely
2
Need more information
3

“Very/extremely interested” is optional interest, not confirmed demand or enrollment. Demand alone does not establish delivery capacity.

N4 What would affect the decisionvalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 9
Schedule
10
Cost
4
Topics/provider qualifications
0
Childcare
5
Transportation
0
Accessibility
0
Privacy
0
Online option
0
Other
0
No interest now
0
N5 Preferred formatvalid 14 · N/A 0 · missing 9
Weekly 30–45 minute group
5
Occasional workshop
4
Individual support
0
Online/hybrid
5
Other
0
Would not participate
0

Questions to explore (leaders and participants)

  • Leaders rate Welcome and continued connection at 73/100 (domain A), while 5 of 20 participants answered “No” and 6 “Partly” to R10. Consider reviewing how next steps are communicated. (3 did not want a next step — that is not a failed follow-up.)
  • Leaders rate Consistency and accountability at 25/100 (domain D); 5 of 20 participants did not know whom to contact (R11). This doesn’t show resources are missing — it may be a visibility question.

Strengths and priorities

Strengths to preserve

  • Relative strength: A. Welcome and continued connection — 73/100

Up to two priorities to discuss

  • F. Progress and learning — 15/100
  • C. Participant goals and useful resources — 19/100

Lowest eligible scores; ties are listed in fixed A–F order.

Recommendation

Strengthen an existing practice

Focus on domain F and domain C.

Pilot readiness (unscored)

Preparation checklist: Chosen topic · Facilitator capacity · Schedule · Resource access · Cost/budget clarity

Three actions for the next 30 days (on your own)

  1. Record a simple starting point for one group and schedule a 30-day review that includes difficulties and people who disengaged (F1–F3). [Leadership domain F: 15/100]
  2. Invite interested participants to name one life area they want to strengthen, without assigning goals; list two resources for the most common request (C1–C3). [Leadership domain C: 19/100]
  3. Name one person to follow up with each guest who asks for connection, and check weekly whether contact happened (A1–A3). [Leadership domain A (maintenance): 73/100]

Action record

Next steps unclear to some worship attendees — Announce one clear next step and name a contact each Sunday · Owner Member coordinator · Due 2026-11-30 · Review 2026-12-07
Evidence: R10: 5 of 14 answered No; domain A 67/100

Next step — always optional

These findings are yours to use with your ministry team. If helpful, Nate Scott can review them with you.

Review our findings with Nate Scott